Web 2.0 is the second generation of interoperable Internet services. If earlier the user could only consume content, now he has the opportunity to independently produce it and exchange it with other site users (user-generated content). This became the basis for the commercialization of the Internet - entire areas of activity were en masse digitized, otherwise, they risked dying. That is; retail, banking, advertising, media, and entertainment...
It also became the basis for social networks as virtual communication platforms. This can include any interaction from written blogs to audio podcasts, from RSS to commonplace tags that allow you to find content based on your interests more efficiently. Prime examples of Web 2.0 are Apple, Amazon, Google, and other FAANG representatives.
While web 2.0 appears to be a more evolved approach to the internet, it nevertheless has a number of flaws. What about the protection of your personal information? In Web 2.0, trusted institutions gain control over users' data, owing to the requirement for trusted intermediaries. When two parties don't know or trust each other and need to conduct a transaction, they must rely on trusted intermediaries. The middleman, on the other hand, has control over data storage and administration, which strengthens their grip on users. Furthermore, centralized power has never worked effectively during times of crisis, necessitating decentralization. In the debate over "what is the difference between web 2.0 and web 3.0?" the latter party has a potential answer. Web 2.0 is the participative social web or the second generation of internet services that enables read and write functionalities. On the other hand, Web 3.0 is the third generation of the web which focuses on the semantic web. It basically focuses on enabling better communication and understanding between users and machines on decentralized infrastructures.
Focus The next critical aspect for identifying web 2.0 and web 3.0 differences would obviously draw attention towards the primary focus. Web 2.0 focused on enabling users to interact with content on the internet. On the other hand, Web 3.0 fosters immersion in the content on the internet by becoming an active contributor. While web 2.0 aimed to connect people, web 3.0 aims to connect knowledge. On a broader level, the focus of web 2.0 reflected largely on tagging and end-user experiences. Web 3.0 turned its focus towards user empowerment by facilitating improved trust, security, and privacy. So, you could clearly identify that the focus area is a notable aspect in web 2.0 vs. web 3.0 comparisons. You have web 2.0 focusing particularly on community development while web 3.0 intends to empower individuals.
Technologies The third important differentiating factor in web 2.0 vs web 3.0 comparison would refer to the underlying technologies. Web 2.0 has played a decisive role in fostering the development of many new technologies. Some of the notable technologies underlying the growth of web 2.0 include AJAX and JavaScript. In addition, you can also notice the dominance of CSS3 and HTML5 among the technologies empowering Web 2.0. On the other hand of the spectrum, you can find web 3.0 providing support for the implementation of innovative technologies. The major technologies underpinning the foundation of web 3.0 include AI, semantic web, and decentralized protocols. The other notable technologies underlying the growth of web 3.0 include knowledge bases and ontologies.
Types of Applications Another crucial factor for answering “what is the difference between web 2.0 and web 3.0?” would refer to the types of applications associated with them. In the case of web 2.0, you can find web applications. Some of the examples of web 2.0 applications include two-way web pages, video websites, podcasts, and personal blogs. On the contrary, web 3.0 empowers the growth of smart applications with capabilities for leveraging ML and AI functionalities. The notable examples of web 3.0 applications might include multi-user virtual environments, 3D portals, and integrated games.
State of Data The state of data is also another prominent factor in the outline of web 2.0 and web 3.0 differences. In the case of web 2.0, the network takes ownership of the data. However, web 3.0 implies the ownership of data by an entity alongside flexibility for sharing data throughout the network.
Features The final highlight for web 2.0 vs web 3.0 comparison would obviously point out to the features. Web 2.0 allows better interaction alongside introducing a wide range of web applications. In addition, it also relies on interactive advertising. On the other hand, web 3.0 relies on behavioral marketing and offers smart, web-based functionalities and applications. As a matter of fact, web 3.0 offers a perfect representation of the blend between web technology and knowledge representation
This is article is part of the tasks for Blockgames. (blockgames.gg), Nestcoin's site (nestcoin.com), and Zuriteam's site (zuri.team).